↯Clarificeprototype
DayWeekQuarter
← Dashboard
DQ

Derek Qureshi

Payments Manager · Engineering · M1 · reports to Cora Kovac

Useful score · Week ending Jul 7
47Solid
vs Engineering · M1 (n=6)
Outcomes
0
docs, PRs, features, decisions
Value delivered
0.0
impact × credit
Days worked
1
no time off
Follow-through
—
no commitments due

Projects they shaped

attributed from evidence · no self-review needed
Fix the lint config
Contributor · 4% credit
shipped

Activity flow

ClaudeSlack
2026-07-012026-07-01

Why this score

weighted sum of cohort percentiles
Value delivered0 pts/day · weight 45%41.7th pct → +18.8
Collaboration1 peers+threads · weight 20%58.3th pct → +11.7
Consistency0.5 0–1 · weight 15%50th pct → +7.5
Tool leverage2 tools · weight 10%50th pct → +5.0
Engagement (raw activity)2 signals/day · weight 10%41.7th pct → +4.2
Useful score47.2

Evidence vs level rubric

Manager · M1
Evidence tracks at level

Evidence broadly supports the current-level expectations.

  • Impact & scope
    Delivers a team's delivery through their team(s).
    ~Some evidence
    • · Value delivered in the 46th percentile of their track · 0 outcomes
  • Collaboration & influence
    Aligns stakeholders and represents the team's work across and upward.
    ~Some evidence
    • · Collaboration signal in the 57th percentile of track
    • · Contributed to 1 cross-team project
  • Execution & reliability
    Reliably delivers what they commit to; unblocks others.
    ○Human-assessed
    • · Too few decided commitments this period to judge
  • Direction & judgment
    Sets priorities and makes calls that shape the team's outcomes.
    ✗No evidence
    • · No decisions or project leadership observed this period
  • Craft & quality
    Sustains high quality and a steady, dependable cadence.
    ~Some evidence
    • · Cadence in the 50th percentile of track
  • Growing others
    Coaches and levels up the people around them (mentoring, thoughtful review).
    ✗No evidence
    • · No enablement actions toward more-junior teammates observed
    Signals: PR reviews, doc comments, pairing, and public-channel help directed at more-junior teammates.

Evidence mapped to your imported rubric. A human makes the leveling call — this is the receipts, not the verdict. Evidence found for 5 of 6 expectations.

Follow-through

did they do what they committed to?
—0/0 commitments kept
  • No commitments due this period.

AI leverage & augmentation

what agents can take on · what’s above an agent
0%of observed activity is routine enough to offload to an agent
AI-assisted · 100%

Above an agent

  • ▴ Little human-differentiated output observed this period

Task-level augmentation analysis — where agents can help and where human work must be kept. Not a person-level replaceability score.

Value chains & cost

signal → meeting → doc → shipped · with a cost ledger

No reconstructed value chains in this period.

Outcomes this period

None recorded.