↯Clarificeprototype
DayWeekQuarter
← Dashboard
MB

Marcus Bianchi

Senior Engineer · Engineering · IC4 · reports to Derek Qureshi

Useful score · Week ending Jul 7
56Solid
vs Engineering · IC4 (n=6)

Driving value

  • ▴ Tool leverage: top of cohort (91.7th pct)
  • ▴ Engagement (raw activity): top of cohort (83.3th pct)

Watch-outs

  • —
Outcomes
0
docs, PRs, features, decisions
Value delivered
0.0
impact × credit
Days worked
1
no time off
Follow-through
100%
3/3 kept · 0 dropped

Projects they shaped

attributed from evidence · no self-review needed
Fix the lint config
Contributor · 6% credit
shipped
Fix the broken link in docs
Contributor · 5% credit
shipped
Fix the log noise
Contributor · 1% credit
shipped
Fix the dependency bump
Contributor · 2% credit
shipped
Fix the lint config
Contributor · 2% credit
shipped

Activity flow

ClaudeSlackJira
2026-07-012026-07-01

Why this score

weighted sum of cohort percentiles
Value delivered0 pts/day · weight 45%41.7th pct → +18.8
Collaboration1 peers+threads · weight 20%58.3th pct → +11.7
Consistency0.5 0–1 · weight 15%50th pct → +7.5
Tool leverage3 tools · weight 10%91.7th pct → +9.2
Engagement (raw activity)3 signals/day · weight 10%83.3th pct → +8.3
Useful score55.5

Evidence vs level rubric

Staff-track IC · IC4
Evidence tracks at level

Evidence broadly supports the current-level expectations.

  • Impact & scope
    Owns cross-team initiatives.
    ~Some evidence
    • · Value delivered in the 46th percentile of their track · 0 outcomes
  • Collaboration & influence
    Drives alignment across teams; influences beyond their own group.
    ~Some evidence
    • · Collaboration signal in the 45th percentile of track
    • · Contributed to 5 cross-team projects
  • Execution & reliability
    Reliably delivers what they commit to; unblocks others.
    ✓Strong evidence
    • · Kept 100% of commitments (3/3)
  • Direction & judgment
    Makes sound technical/product decisions others build on.
    ✗No evidence
    • · No decisions or project leadership observed this period
  • Craft & quality
    Sustains high quality and a steady, dependable cadence.
    ~Some evidence
    • · Cadence in the 50th percentile of track
  • Growing others
    Coaches and levels up the people around them (mentoring, thoughtful review).
    ✗No evidence
    • · No enablement actions toward more-junior teammates observed
    Signals: PR reviews, doc comments, pairing, and public-channel help directed at more-junior teammates.

Evidence mapped to your imported rubric. A human makes the leveling call — this is the receipts, not the verdict. Evidence found for 6 of 6 expectations.

Follow-through

did they do what they committed to?
100%3/3 commitments kept
33% on time
  • TicketFix the lint configfrom Beth Fenwick · due 2026-07-01
    On time
  • TicketFix the stale feature flagfrom Beth Fenwick · due 2026-07-01
    Late
  • TicketFix the deprecated endpointfrom Omar Novak · due 2026-07-01
    Late

AI leverage & augmentation

what agents can take on · what’s above an agent
33%of observed activity is routine enough to offload to an agent
AI-assisted · 67%Routine · automatable · 33%

Above an agent

  • ▴ Little human-differentiated output observed this period

Task-level augmentation analysis — where agents can help and where human work must be kept. Not a person-level replaceability score.

Value chains & cost

signal → meeting → doc → shipped · with a cost ledger

No reconstructed value chains in this period.

Outcomes this period

None recorded.