↯Clarificeprototype
DayWeekQuarter
← Dashboard
TB

Tom Bianchi

Engineer · Engineering · IC3 · reports to Fatima Dupont

Useful score · Week ending Jul 7
43Needs attention
vs Engineering · IC3 (n=10)

Driving value

  • —

Watch-outs

  • ▾ Collaboration: bottom of cohort (15th pct)
Outcomes
0
docs, PRs, features, decisions
Value delivered
0.0
impact × credit
Days worked
1
no time off
Follow-through
100%
1/1 kept · 0 dropped

Projects they shaped

attributed from evidence · no self-review needed
Fix the broken link in docs
Contributor · 10% credit
shipped
Fix the log noise
Contributor · 11% credit
shipped
Fix the log noise
Contributor · 1% credit
shipped
Fix the dependency bump
Contributor · 7% credit
shipped
Fix the lint config
Contributor · 11% credit
shipped

Activity flow

GitHubJira
2026-07-012026-07-01

Why this score

weighted sum of cohort percentiles
Value delivered0 pts/day · weight 45%50th pct → +22.5
Collaboration0 peers+threads · weight 20%15th pct → +3.0
Consistency0.5 0–1 · weight 15%50th pct → +7.5
Tool leverage2 tools · weight 10%50th pct → +5.0
Engagement (raw activity)2 signals/day · weight 10%45th pct → +4.5
Useful score42.5

Evidence vs level rubric

Senior IC · IC3
Evidence tracks at level

Evidence broadly supports the current-level expectations.

  • Impact & scope
    Owns features including their edge cases.
    ~Some evidence
    • · Value delivered in the 46th percentile of their track · 0 outcomes
    e.g. shipped the payments retry work end-to-end
  • Collaboration & influence
    Works well with their team and builds shared context.
    ~Some evidence
    • · Collaboration signal in the 9th percentile of track
    • · Contributed to 5 cross-team projects
  • Execution & reliability
    Reliably delivers what they commit to; unblocks others.
    ○Human-assessed
    • · Too few decided commitments this period to judge
  • Direction & judgment
    Makes sound technical/product decisions others build on.
    ✗No evidence
    • · No decisions or project leadership observed this period
  • Craft & quality
    Sustains high quality and a steady, dependable cadence.
    ~Some evidence
    • · Cadence in the 50th percentile of track

Evidence mapped to your imported rubric. A human makes the leveling call — this is the receipts, not the verdict. Evidence found for 4 of 5 expectations.

Follow-through

did they do what they committed to?
100%1/1 commitments kept
0% on time
  • TicketFix the lint configfrom Tom Zhang · due 2026-07-01
    Late

AI leverage & augmentation

what agents can take on · what’s above an agent
50%of observed activity is routine enough to offload to an agent
AI-assisted · 50%Routine · automatable · 50%

Above an agent

  • ▴ Little human-differentiated output observed this period

Task-level augmentation analysis — where agents can help and where human work must be kept. Not a person-level replaceability score.

Value chains & cost

signal → meeting → doc → shipped · with a cost ledger

No reconstructed value chains in this period.

Outcomes this period

None recorded.